🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.