Dining Across the Gap: Perspectives on Migration and Culture
Introducing the Participants
Stephen, 64, Canvey Island
Occupation: Retired insurance professional
Voting record: Usually Conservative, except when he resided in “the socialist republic of south Hackney” and voted for the SDP
Interesting fact: His specialty in underwriting was hostage situations: People often claim that insurance is dull, but it’s far from it when you’re discussing rescuing people from the Korean peninsula because the DPRK have opened the missile silos”
Eva, 25, the capital
Profession: Graduate in psychology
Voting record: In her native land, New Zealand, she voted a combination of Labour and Green
Interesting fact: Eva has worked as a singer on ocean liners; her most extended voyage was half a year, which is a long time to be at sea
For starters
Eva: Steve seemed there to have a nice time, to be open
He: She seemed like a very intelligent, well-spoken, pleasant person
She: I had a caprese salad, pasta with fungi, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
The big beef
She: He was definitely on the side of immigration being curtailed. He believes that UK residents who already live here, not just Caucasian Britons, face limited access to the things that they need, because increasing numbers are entering. However I just don’t think the figures are that bad
He: I’m for skilled immigration, I have no desire to reside in a homogeneous, WASP country with tepid ale. But I believe that governments have exploited immigration to fill the jobs they can’t get people to do without increasing salaries. Pay are kept low, so levies have to be minimized, so we are unable to improve services – spend more money on child support, on education, on innovation
She: I am not deeply informed of Brexit, because I was 16 and abroad when it occurred. He explained it to me in a new light. He told me about “posted workers” – candidates could come here and only be paid the wage of the their nation of origin
He: Macron spent 24 months getting the EU to do away with the system; it was revised in 2018. Previously, posted workers coming in were undercutting British workers. Under Gordon Brown, it was oil workers that were brought in; later it’s been hospitality, farms. She understood that, because she’d worked on a cruise ship and said she was paid a lot more than international colleagues
Common ground
He: It would be ideal to have a alternative power, transition from fossil fuels. I disapprove of environmental harm, I value fresh atmosphere, I appreciate rural areas. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of Norway?” Their oil and gas profits skyrocketed after Ukraine started, they allocated those funds to develop green infrastructure
She: So we’re using their oil. You can see that’s not a good way to proceed. He was supportive of maintaining domestic drilling for the small amount we’ll require in the coming years. I partially concur with him. We’re still going to use planes. We both think we should be moving towards environmentally friendly options, turbine fields and water power
For afters
Eva: We touched on Islamophobia, though we didn’t call it that. He seemed worried by radical ideologies entering – he did mention that a lot of the people in the Arab world were extremist, which I didn’t think fair. I think it’s discriminatory to make judgments based on faith
Steve: I hail from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to that district, and she said it had been modernized. Obviously, I would say that: populated by professionals. But when I go down that local market, I appear out of place. People gaze at me because it’s become very Muslim. She gave a slight glance at me about that. I used the word segregated area. Eva’s got Polish-Jewish ancestry – she doesn’t like that word, to her it denotes deprivation. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes their own.” I consented to substitute a different word – maybe community?
She: I believe that Muslim people are really disproportionately shown in the news outlets as engaging in misconduct. It seems a somewhat racist, or xenophobic
Conclusion
He: I think we parted on good terms. We had a embrace at the train stop
Eva: We both said that we’d had a wonderful evening